News and Photos

MSA Facebook Photo page
Mar 15, 2010

MSA has gone Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/pages/Montana-Snowmobile-Association/371333199027 check it out be come a friend and ask on the wall to add photos.

Big Sky Snowriders Facebook
Mar 15, 2010

 Big Sky Snowriders (Livingston Mt)  has gone Facebook check it out http://www.facebook.com/pages/Livingston-MT/Big-Sky-Snowriders/358549091119

Volunteers keep winter trails well-groomed
Mar 10, 2010

Published 3.5.2010

Volunteers keep winter trails well-groomed
By Matt Dettori, Enterprise Staff Writer

Volunteers keep winter trails well-groomed

Enterprise photo by Matt Dettori

Kemp O’Neill toggles the joystick that controls the front blade of a 2001 Bombardier snowcat Thursday morning, March 4, in the Crazy Mountains. O’Neill, who’s been grooming for 17 years, is one of three volunteers from the Big Sky Snowriders chapter of the Montana Snowmobile Association that takes care of several snowmobile, ski and dogsled trails in Park County.

This season’s snowpack levels continue to sit lower than average into March, which gives area volunteer trail groomers more reason to continue to take care of the snowy trails.

Big Sky Snowriders, the Park County chapter of the Montana Snow Mobile Association, manages several winter trails in the Crazy and Absaroka mountains.

Trails used by snowmobilers, along with skiers and dogsleds, develop large bumps and deep troughs from the various types of riding they endure. Any snowmobiler, musher or cross-country skier who’s ridden the bumps will agree it’s not a fun ride, said Big Sky Snowriders Grooming Committee Chairman Wayne Ford, who is also one of the grooming volunteers.

That’s why the Park County chapter turns the rough trails into smooth corduroy pathways.

“You get a good hard base on the trail (by grooming),” Ford said. “It takes longer for the snow to melt, and our riding season will be longer.”

When riders have a bumpy experience on a trail, they are inclined to go elsewhere the next time they ride, Ford said. Having a good trail will appeal to more snowmobilers, and snomobilers bring in “a lot of money,” to the community, he added.

The smooth paths aren’t just for an easy ride and a longer-lasting trail, but also for safety, Ford said.

“When you meet traffic (on the trail) the bumps could bounce you into oncoming traffic or ... off the trail,” said MSA member and Livingston resident Kemp O’Neill.

The groomers also take care of removing objects from the pathway such as fallen timber and rocks, he said.

The Big Sky Snowriders grooming committee grooms more than 40 miles of trails within the Crazy and Absaroka mountains. The three trails they groom are the Shields River Road loop, the Ibex trail south of the loop and Mill Creek in Paradise Valley.

The grooming program is administered through the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Recreational Department.

A portion of the state’s gas tax is given out to different MSA clubs to use for grooming and trail maintenance expenses. The tax is from payment for gas used for snowmobiles in the state, Ford said.

The Big Sky Snowriders purchased its own groomer several years ago. The club was able to lease a much nicer 2001 Bombardier snowcat from FWP this year, said Snowriders member Kemp O’Neill.

Every two years, funds from the FWP gas tax are used to purchase a new snowcat for a different club in Montana, O’Neill said.

O’Neill, Ford and Clint Juhnke are the three stewards that volunteer their time to groom the snowmobile, ski and sled trails.

O’Neill spent all day Thursday grooming the Shields River Road loop in the northern Crazy Mountains in preparation for the annual Big Sky Snowriders Poker Fun Run fundraiser set for Sunday. The event, which involves getting a playing card and making stops for more cards along the Shields River Road loop, has seen as many as 200 participants in previous years.

The first card for the 22-mile Fun Run will be given at 9 a.m. and the last card will be handed out at 11 a.m. The cost is $5 for each hand. The best hand gets a cash prize, O’Neill said.

Riders, once they receive a card, will drive the entire Shields loop, stopping along the way at checkpoints to collect card for their poker hands. The last stop is at the Shields River Campground. Chili and hot dogs will be served at the final stop.

The organization will also sell raffle and 50-50 tickets for $1 each. The raffle is for a fully processed pig. All proceeds will go toward the Big Sky Snowriders chapter.

 

News from District 10
Jan 19, 2010

News from District 10

Hello All- we received the long-awaited decision from Judge Molloy on the Gallatin case. Basically it just tracks Judge Lynch's F&R, with some editorializing and additional flair thrown in as we have come to expect from Judge Molloy.  This ruling by Judge Molloy stated that the Forest Service did not demonstrate how its 2006 Travel Plan complied with the Wilderness Study Act's requirement that future management maintain the wilderness character of this area as it existed in 1977, when the Act was passed.

  

Then the USFS moved that the Court "clarify or amend" the Gallatin order/judgment. Basically they want the court to clarify that the order should not apply outside of the WSA, i.e. the travel plan is still in effect for the rest of the Forest.  RE the WSA, the motion asks for "guidance" on how to administer motorized/mechanized use on remaining forest.

 

The USFS has made a decision as to management of snowmobiling this winter on an interim basis in order to comply with judge Molloys order in the MWA case.   Essentially the Big Sky trail will remain open and about 2700 acres in the north end of the WSA.  They claim these areas were documented as open and used in 1977. The rest of the Buffalo-Horn Porcupine Hylite WSA was closed on Dec. 1, 2009.

 

Then Citizens for Balanced Use (CBU), the Gallatin Valley Snowmobile Association, Big Sky Snowriders and Dr. Kenneth Zahn filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to appeal a ruling by United States District Court Judge Donald Molloy that closed recreation in the Hyalite-Porcupine Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study Area.

 

 

I hope I’m not losing anyone with this soap opera!

 

TSA, MTVRA, and MSA have filed a cross-appeal so we can keep a dog in this fight as it moves though the 9th Circuit.

 

The bottom line is that the USFS was not satisfied with the 60% closure of the Gallatin National Forest to motorized use with the Travel Plan, but now they have closed 155,000 acres of the BHPH WSA to winter use.

 

I’m not even going into Mr. One Term Tester’s S1470 wilderness bill as I’m on overload, but it too will take a hell of a bite out of our Buck Creek riding.

 

Ride what you can today as they may take it away tomorrow.

 

Think Snow, Ride Safe and God Bless

 From District 10

Kemp O’Neill

 

A plan to require 7,000 acres to be logged annually in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest for the next 10 years met some skepticism on Capitol Hill Thursday.
Dec 18, 2009


 


ERIK PETERSEN/CHRONICLE RY Timber employee Donald Sheen unloads a timber shipment in Livingston on Thursday afternoon. Sen. Tester’s proposed wildland legislation drew fire on Capitol Hill during the bill’s first hearing on Thursday.
The requirement is a major component of Sen. Jon Tester’s sweeping forest bill, which had its first congressional hearing Thursday afternoon.

Tester and supporters of his bill say the requirement would provide struggling lumber mills with logs and reduce the number of beetle-killed trees in the forest, which includes the Madison Mountain Range southwest of Bozeman.

However, members of the Obama administration and environmentalists told a Senate Energy and Natural Resources subcommittee that the provision could set a dangerous precedent for forest management and prove difficult to implement.

Harris Sherman, an undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said 1,000 acres is logged, on average, in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. Increasing that to 7,000 acres every year is “not reasonable or achievable,” he said.

GA_googleFillSlot("Large_Square"); Also, the cost of advertising and implementing timber sales would be costly for the U.S. Forest Service, Sherman said.

“I do not have a precise figure,” he said. “It would certainly run into the millions of dollars on an annual basis.”

Meanwhile, Matthew Koehler, of the Missoula-based WildWest Institute, told the subcommittee that the mandated logging provisions “are unprecedented and represent an unscientific override of current forest planning.”

But Tester and a coalition of loggers and conservationists who support the legislation defended the mandates.

Tester said pine-beetles had turned the Beaverhead-Deerlodge forest into a “sea of red,” and said more forest needs to be opened up to logging if Montana’s lumber mills are expected to stay open.

“We cannot afford to lose these people who know how to manage our forests,” he said of the mills.

In a phone interview after the hearing, Tester said his bill would contain the cost of timber sales, in part because it would be harder to sue the Forest Service over logging proposals.

“If we get this bill passed, it’s going to reduce litigation in a big, big way,” he said.

Along with the logging requirements, the bill would create 677,000 acres of wilderness, most of it in Southwest Montana, garnering the support of many major environmental groups.

If passed, it would be the first new wilderness designation in Montana in 25 years.
 

 

Sen. Tester's Plan for Wilderness, Logging Roils Big Sky Country
Dec 18, 2009

 

Published: December 14, 2009
New York Times

Trying to satisfy everyone from wilderness advocates to timber companies, Sen. Jon Tester has proposed a new model for managing national forests.

 
The Democrat's controversial proposal, which he has dubbed the "Forest Jobs and Recreation Act" to emphasize its economic aspects rather than its wilderness components, would guide how federal agencies manage large swaths of land in his home state of Montana.

S. 1470 (pdf) would designate hundreds of thousands of acres as wilderness, while releasing other lands that have been protected as wilderness study areas. The measure would permanently open certain national forest areas to motorized recreation. And -- in the most contentious proposal -- it would require timber harvest on a minimum number of acres each year.

The proposal, long a hot topic in Montana, will garner the Senate spotlight Thursday when the subcommittee that oversees forests takes it up. The panel will hear from federal officials as well as Montana mill owners, county commissioners and the environmental community that has split over the measure.

Tester describes his bill as a common-sense approach that will create jobs in Montana's forests, guarantee access for motorized recreation, protect clean water and keep some of the state's prized backcountry wild. Supporters say it could provide a new path for other states to follow.

Critics say the bill's main purpose is to promote commercial logging and allow local management of national forest lands.

But no one disputes that the legislation would have a profound effect on the future of Montana's national forests.

What the bill does

The 84-page bill would designate about 680,000 acres as wilderness in 25 separate parcels, ranging from 661 Bureau of Land Management acres that would become the "Farlin Creek Wilderness" to 89,798 acres in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest that would become the "Snowcrest Wilderness."

The bill would designate another 336,000 acres in six chunks of national recreation, protection or special management areas. Logging and mining would be restricted but snowmobiles or off-road vehicles would be allowed. The measure also would end wilderness management for several areas that are currently designated as wilderness study areas.

It would require federal agencies to "mechanically treat timber" on a minimum of 70,000 acres of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest over 10 years and at least 30,000 acres of the Three Rivers Ranger District within a decade.

The thinning projects would be focused on areas where roads are already built. The agencies would prepare one environmental impact statement to cover all components of "landscape-scale restoration projects" covering at least 50,000 acres.

Federal agencies would establish resources advisory committees for each landscape-scale project that would include officials from industrial, recreational, conservation and livestock organizations as well as local collaborative forest management groups. The committees would assist the agencies in determining the location for, completing the design of and implementing each project.

Reaction

Tester says the bill brought together mill owners, conservationists, hunters and motorized users who had fought each other for decades.

"Amid all the shouting, no one got what they wanted," Tester said in a speech on the Senate floor. "And all Montanans and especially our forests suffered for it."

A compromise is necessary because Montana's forests face a crisis, largely due to beetle infestation that has killed off trees and raised the risk of wildfire, Tester said, adding the bill would provide jobs by removing the dead materials, building culverts for fish and restoring streams.

A Forest Service spokesman said the agency currently has no position on the bill. The committee Thursday will hear from Harris Sherman, the Agriculture Undersecretary for Natural Resources and Environment, and Marcilynn Burke, deputy director of the Bureau of Land Management.

Trout Unlimited, the National Wildlife Federation and Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership all have endorsed the bill along with local logging companies. A coalition of environmental organizations led by Alliance for the Wild Rockies and the Wild West Institute and many motorized recreationists oppose the measure.

The Democrat's controversial proposal, which he has dubbed the "Forest Jobs and Recreation Act" to emphasize its economic aspects rather than its wilderness components, would guide how federal agencies manage large swaths of land in his home state of Montana.

S. 1470 (pdf) would designate hundreds of thousands of acres as wilderness, while releasing other lands that have been protected as wilderness study areas. The measure would permanently open certain national forest areas to motorized recreation. And -- in the most contentious proposal -- it would require timber harvest on a minimum number of acres each year.

The proposal, long a hot topic in Montana, will garner the Senate spotlight Thursday when the subcommittee that oversees forests takes it up. The panel will hear from federal officials as well as Montana mill owners, county commissioners and the environmental community that has split over the measure.

Tester describes his bill as a common-sense approach that will create jobs in Montana's forests, guarantee access for motorized recreation, protect clean water and keep some of the state's prized backcountry wild. Supporters say it could provide a new path for other states to follow.

Critics say the bill's main purpose is to promote commercial logging and allow local management of national forest lands.

But no one disputes that the legislation would have a profound effect on the future of Montana's national forests.

"If it does pass, it'll signify the Democrats are trying to be worse than the Republicans when it comes to public lands in the West -- a race to the bottom," said Mike Garrity, executive director for the Alliance for the Wild Rockies.

Opponents of the bill say setting logging levels in to law would be an unprecedented and unscientific override of forest planning by federal agency staff. The coalition of groups fighting the bill said the mandated timber levels greatly exceed average levels since the 1950s on the Beaverhead-Deerlodge forest and are 14 times the sustainable level set by the Forest Service. The map that accompanies Tester's bill shows that more than 1 million acres of federally inventoried roadless wildlands would be classified as "timber suitable or open to harvest," the groups say.

Garrity said the timber mandates are counter to policies designed to address past abuses by the Forest Service of over-logging. "All those lessons of the past he's ignoring and saying we have to mandate logging," Garrity said.

Critics also dislike the provisions that would release wildness study areas that were protected under a law sponsored by the late Sen. Lee Metcalf (D-Mont.) and BLM-administered areas that have been protected more than 30 years. They say the wilderness designated is in small and disconnected areas, not well suited to wildlife.

Opponents also say the bill would localize management of national forests. If other lawmakers push similar bills for their states, it could fragment regulations of the country's forests, they argue.

They also say were left out of negotiations that crafted the bill. "Senator Tester claimed they worked with anyone who was willing to work with him," Garrity said. "That's just not true. ... They refused to work with me."

The Snowmobile Alliance of Western States opposes the additional wilderness and says remaining public lands should be left open for recreation.

Support

Showcasing support from the timber industry, Tester unveiled the measure in July at the RY Timber company in Townsend, Mont. Sherman Anderson, president and owner of Sun Mountain Lumber Inc., has been pushing the bill and will praise it at the hearing Thursday. Mill owners say thinning projects will remove dead trees while ensuring the logging infrastructure of the state survives.

Tom Reed of Trout Unlimited said his group supports the bill because the wilderness areas will protect streams and headwaters that are important for fisheries, while the restoration work would also improve rivers. He also said the timber harvest would provide funds for some of those efforts.

Reed said the bill would set a precedent for cooperation without localizing forest management. "Certainly the Forest Service has long relied on local input and I think this actually solidifies that," he said.

Trout Unlimited also supports the proposed logging levels because they would be prioritized in the wildland-urban interface -- not in roadless areas -- and in areas of insect infestation.

"We're not talking about old growth-type huge timber, we're talking principally about lodgepole," Reed said. The mandates are not for boardfeet but rather for acres, so it does not mean the areas will be clear cut, he added.

And the bill strikes the right balance between keeping some of the most pristine habitat as wilderness and releasing some of the wilderness study areas that could be used for other purposes such as mountain biking, Reed said. Because Montana has a number of smaller mountain rangers, "it doesn't make sense to make one huge piece of country wilderness," he said.

Schedule: The hearing is Thursday, Dec. 17, at 2:30 p.m. in 366 Dirksen.

Witnesses: Marcilynn Burke, Bureau of Land Management deputy director; Harris Sherman, Agriculture undersecretary for Natural Resources and Environment; Mike McGinley, county commissioner, Beaverhead County, Mont.; Sherman Anderson, president and owner of Sun Mountain Lumber Inc.; Ronald Hurt, county commissioner, Fremont County, Idaho; Tim Baker, executive director, Montana Wilderness Association; Matthew Koehler, executive director, Wild West Institute; and Chris Wood, chief operating officer, Trout Unlimited.

Gallatin Hyalite WSA
Nov 13, 2009

 

 

This was recived from the FS today. I just want everybody to be aware that all, but 2700 acres, of the WSA between the Yellowstone and the Gallatin Rivers is now closed to snowmobiling. e-mail me at kempo@wispwest.net and I will forward you the maps if you would like to see them. 

Kemp

 

The following is from;

 Alan J. Campbell
USDA - Office of the General Counsel
Missoula MT
Phone (406) 329-3072
FAX      (406) 329-3064
ACampbell@fs.fed.us

The Gallatin has made a decison as to management of snowmobiling this winter on an interim basis in order to comply with judge Molloys order in the MWA case.  The maps attached depict the open areas.  Essentially the Big Sky trail will remain open and about 2700 acres in the north end of the WSA.  Both were documented as open and used in 1977

e mail
Oct 19, 2009
We now have our own e-mail account for our members to correspond with us. bigskysnowriders@yahoo.com
Keeping you safe in the out doors
Oct 15, 2009

I would like to talk about Outdoor Safety!  I like to get out and ride snowmobiles in the winter and hunt also, so this information will be useful for anybody that goes outdoors!

 

Last fall, I bought a SPOT (www.findmespot.com).  The neat thing about the SPOT is when I get to the area that I'm going to go play, I hit the 'I'm OK' button to let my contacts know where I am starting from.  Then when I stop for lunch I hit the 'I'm OK' button again to let them know which direction I headed!  Then when I get back to the truck I hit it again to let them know I am done playing for the day and will be headed home!

 

You set it up from your computer by selecting from your contact list the people you want to notify.  You can either have the message go to their computers or their phones.  It gives the GPS location every time you hit the 'I'm OK' button so they know where I am at (especially the Wife so she doesn't start spending the life insurance money that day!).  This is where I want to mention that it is a good idea to include someone on your list of contacts that would actually come find you!  (Again, the Wife may not if you are worth more Dead than Alive!)

 

This device also has a button that sends 'Help...I'm OK but need assistance'.  For example, I hit the 'I'm OK' button three times means I'm back to the truck.  If I need assistance, I hit the 'Help' button which lets my contacts know to send a wrecker to the GPS location sent to them (they know I need a wrecker because I drive a Government Motors pickup!).

 

Of course, the most important button is the '911' button.  If this button is pushed, it not only goes to your contacts but also to the nearest emergency dispatch or closest search and rescue to alert them to the need for emergency assistance.

 

With this device, anyone hunting, hiking, snowmobiling, ATV'ing, horseback riding or enjoying any outdoor sport will feel secure in knowing that they are just a button away from help if needed and family/friends will also enjoy the security of not having to worry! 

 

Just remember, the $180 that it would cost to purchase a SPOT sitting nice and warm and safe in your bank account isn't doing you any good if your out in the hills somewhere hurt, lost, stuck, hungry and cold!

 

On another note, I want to tell you about our Waxies Fire Starters!  These are a must for any outdoor enthusiast to have on hand.  All you need to make them is a cardboard egg carton, your Wife's old candles and dryer lint!  Cut each square out of the egg carton, fill with lint from the dryer and pour the melted wax from the candles over the lint until full.  (The reason we use the Wife's old candles is we try to guess the fragrance and to give us the homey feel!)  Store them in a zip lock bag with two good lighters (always have two because one will always not work)!  Just light a corner and put in with your branches.  They will burn for about 15 minutes.

 

Please come to our web site and join our contact list to find out what's going on in the Great Outdoors!

Now go out and enjoy!

 

Ed Melcher

Dist 11 rep

 

Rehberg on the park
Oct 15, 2009
 

Rehberg Statement of New Snowmobile Numbers in Yellowstone National Park


WASHINGTON, D.C. -  Montanan’s Congressman, Denny Rehberg, today released the following statement following new restrictions that would limit access to Yellowstone National Park to 318 snowmobiles and 78 snowcoaches per day.

“Montana’s snowmobilers are suffering from regulatory whiplash.  The ongoing off-and-on process between two judges and the Department of Interior has put the whims of bureaucrats and lawyers ahead of the needs of Montanans trying to enjoy this outdoor recreational activity in the Park.  The uncertainty of each winter season continues to have negative impacts on jobs throughout the surrounding small business and tourism industries.”

A thought from District 10
Oct 14, 2009

A thought from District 10

 I sit at my computer and think about the way Yellowstone has been taken away from the snowmobilers and winter use was given to the venders using the Best Available Technology (BAT) snowmobiles  and a guide. That even if you ride a 4 stroke like I do you can’t go in the park unless you have one of the tested for the park two up approved sleds that are in the rented fleets.

We all know that we are slowly getting choked out of our parks and all Public Lands, but what will the Greenies go after next?

Here’s a thought that I would like to throw out there. Peak days this summer show that 30,000 + folks where visiting the park. The horror for the animals, the trails, the roads, the outhouses, and the tax paid employees, that babysit the buffalo riding and bear chasing imbalanced people, can you imagine the amount of money (Tax Payers) that it takes to run this summer drive though Zoo? Now I get to the solution to this summer stress.

#1;  We limit the number of cars to 1,500 per/day of only the Best Available Technology (BAT) cars (hybrids), absolutely no clunkers, maybe we could add some pedals in the front seats. These cars will need to be on the approved list and meet the same stats that the snowmobiles do.

A; Now let me explain #1, 1,500 cars with 2.5 people each is 3,750 people in cars per/day.

#2; These cars will have to have a guide in a guide’s car for every  four cars.

A; That would be about ten people per/guide and this would almost stop the buffalo sitters and bear chasers. This in turn would cut the number of tax paid employees 40%.

                #3; Limit the numbers of busses to 60 per/day only  With Best Available Technology (BAT) .

A; If each bus carries about 50 people that would be about  3,000 more folks. Ten folks per/guide would come to five guides per/bus. I think that they could count the bus driver as one. This could cut the  number of tax paid employees another 30%.

                #4; No motorcycles they make too much noise.

                #5; Limit bicycles to 200 per/day.

A; 10 bicycles per/two guides, they need a guide fount and rear as they stretch out the longest down the road and one guide cannot keep track of all of them.

                #6 Limit back county hiking-camping  to 200 per/day.

                                A; One guide per/ten hiker-campers

 

                This would limit the number in the park to 7,150 per/day. Just think how this would bring back the smiles in the animal’s faces, and reduce the tax paid employees by millions of dollars per/year, put 715 guides to work, roads will last longer, and it would be a lot quieter for all.

                This is a little sarcasm but do you really think that when they make the winter use of our parks nonexistent that they will  all retire and go away? We all have to start fighting like hell! If you don’t ride Yellowstone you still have to fight for it or they will steal[  more of what is ours when we are sleeping.

Think Snow,

Happy Trail

Kemp O’Neill District 10 Director


 [K1]

Sled racing on Water in Billings
Aug 8, 2009
Hello all would you pass around to your members and friends and web site we are looking for about 50 more racers for our event! Call me if you have any question! www.thunderonthewater.com Thanks Ed Melcher
Rehberg Hopes to Stop Yellowstone Access Restriction in its Track
Jul 24, 2009

WASHINGTON, DC - Montana's Congressman, Denny Rehberg, today contacted Secretary of Interior, Ken Salazar, and urged him to re-think plans to cut winter use access to Yellowstone National Park by half. Rehberg's letter was signed by a coalition of Representatives from Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Colorado and Utah including Rep. Lummis (WY-AL), Rep. Simpson (ID-02), Rep. Coffman (CO-06), Rep. Bishop (UT-01) and Rep. Chaffetz (UT-03).

While we are obligated to preserve these parks for future generations, there is also an obligation to the current generation to allow access to these public lands, said Rehberg. Outdoor recreation is a multi-billion dollar a year industry in Montana, and our economy can't take another hit right now. The Interior proposal, in its shortsightedness, also neglects seniors and folks with physical disabilities that experience Montana's backcountry on motorized vehicles. We can protect the environment while also allowing public motorized access. Yellowstone National Park officials have been working collaboratively on this two-fold effort for years. This new wrench in the machine slows the process by forcing them to start all over again and everyone suffers.

Outdoor recreation is critical to Montana's economy, with personal watercraft businesses alone contributing $2.7 billion annually, and Yellowstone National Park has already had more than 1.3 million travelers visit the park this year. Unfortunately, the status of winter use access in Yellowstone has been uncertain for years, largely due to federal meddling between different Administrations and branches of federal government.

Snowmobiling plays a critical role in the local economy and provides access to public lands for thousands who wouldn't otherwise have it, said Rehberg. While some from New York and California are trying to close off millions of acres to motorized vehicles, I hope that we can at least maintain existing public access levels in Yellowstone.

Letter:

The Honorable Ken Salazar
Secretary of the Interior
U.S. Department of the Interior
1849 C Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20240

Dear Secretary Salazar:

We're writing on behalf of our constituents who are concerned about the Department of the Interior's (DOI) proposal to cut in half the number of snowmobiles allowed in Yellowstone National Park during the next two winters.

The issue of snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park has been a long-running concern for more than a decade. In 2007, the National Park Service brokered a much-needed, commonsense plan to allow a limited number of commercially-guided snowmobiles and snow coaches in Yellowstone. This decision came after receiving well over 100,000 public comments. Unfortunately, a Washington, D.C. judge threw out this plan in September, 2008.

Two months after this ruling, a Wyoming judge ruled in a separate case that 720 snowmobiles was the correct allowance. Now, not even a year after the last ruling, the Department of the Interior has proposed to cut this allowance in half.

Snowmobile guides and snow coach operators, including the hotels, restaurants and shops that attract business from their customers, need a long-term plan under which to operate. Month-to-month changes in rulemaking are no longer acceptable, and the DOI must release a plan that frees small businesses from their bureaucratic grip. The original plan was thorough and comprehensive, as officials from all three states held hearings, public meetings and invited significant input from all interested parties. All aspects, including pollution, were weighed in the original decision, but now we have to start over from square one.

Over the past decade, much progress has been made in cutting snowmobile pollution in Yellowstone. New technological advances and stricter emissions requirements have aided this effort. While we appreciate these advancements, they have come at the expense of private snowmobile guides who depend on consistent regulations to guide their operations. After years of executive rule making and judicial wrangling, the issue of snowmobiles in Yellowstone remains unresolved.

We urge your full consideration to reinstate the original plan, which was equitable and well-balanced. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If we can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
Awards
Feb 14, 2009
Jeremy Fatouros is collecting nominations for these awards: 1. Dealer of the Year 2.Club of the Year 3. Snowmobiler of the year 4. Groomer Operator of the year. Contact him at 1 406 223 5055
International Visitors to Yellowstone
Feb 2, 2009
Yellowstone Park Welcomes International Visitors and their Snowmobile Adventure Jack Welch, BlueRibbon Special Projects Consultant On Monday, January 12th I joined a trek into Yellowstone National Park by snowmobile with four United Kingdom visitors. The four Brits were Malcolm McIntosh and Keith Gallant from Manchaster, Calvin Leach from Bidford and Kevin Powell from Nothngham. These four made the trip from England to Jackson, Wyoming to visit Yellowstone Park and wanted to experience snowmobiling and downhill skiing. Our guide was Bob Barlow from Wyoming Adventures, one of the commercial trip providers from Jackson, Wyoming. We started our trek at Flagg Ranch with the destination for the day the Old Faithful area. At Old Faithful we planned on seeing the geyser and having lunch. The whole trip was one hundred miles by snowmobile. My four companions had never snowmobiled before; however, they all had operated "motor bikes" and claimed to be fast learners! The first order of the day was a short safety talk by our guide who covered the operation of the Arctic Cat four stroke machines and the hand signals we would use as we toured the Park. Next, we set out for our first stop, the Yellowstone Park South Gate. This is a very popular stop because of the large Yellowstone entrance sign, a great place for group pictures. With only a few miles under their belts, the Brits really looked forward to riding the Arctic Cat four strokes and the guide and I wanted to make sure they had a great experience on the trek. I also wanted to explain the history of the winter access issue and snowmobiling in the Park. The weather was cool and crisp, the trail was, of course, the groomed summer highway and it was smooth. As we headed for our next stop, the Lewis River Falls, the riders got their first taste of the beautiful scenic vistas of the Park as we traveled along the rim of the Lewis River Canyon. They also saw evidence of the historic 1988 Yellowstone fires. At the falls the Brits commented that so far the snowmobile was a great way to experience the Park and looked forward to the rest of the day. In addition, one of the riders asked why the snowmobiles had restrictors on the throttles? I explained the Park's speed limit is only 45 mph and these Arctic Catswithout restrictors would go much faster. I also pointed out to the group that the snowmobile is just one of the forms of transport in Yellowstone for winter access. The group commented that this trip in the Park would be the major highlight of their first trip on holiday to the United States. We continued on to the OlD Faithful area with a short restroom stop at West Thumb. During our stop at West Thumb the Brits got to see their first Snow Coach and asked about how it fit into the Yellowstone transportation system. I explained that it was another form of access to the Park. The Brits commented they like the snowmobile better! We reached Old Faithful just as the geyser went off. In other words, we missed it and had to wait another ninty minutes for the next eruption. With time to spend before the eruption our guide suggested we eat lunch in the Geyser Grill. During the lunch I was asked why anti groups want to eliminate access by snowmobile to Yellowstone. I explained the issues and how the snowmobile community had solved the problems presented. The Brits commented that they "thought the Queen and Royal Family would enjoy an outing to Yellowstone by snowmobile and that it was wrong to limit the choices on access to the Park in the winter." After lunch we saw Old Faithful Geyser and spent some time viewing the thermal areas on the road to Madison Junction. The Brits saw a coyote and also had the opportunity to encounter a bison herd on the groomed road. The Brits really liked the experience of being up front and personnel with those "Big Beasts"! Time was growing late and we started back to Flagg Ranch. We arrived at Flagg at 5 pm. After filling the Arctic Cats with fuel we exchanged contact information and the Brits agreed that "closing snowmobile access to Yellowstone would just not be right because they felt that the snowmobile provided the best form of transportation to see the natural wonders of Yellowstone Park!" As we said our goodbyes they stated they would be back next year to Yellowstone for another winter snowmobile adventure!_
Wilderness form letter
Feb 2, 2009
Senator Max Baucus 511 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510-2602 Senator Jon Tester 204 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510-2603 Representative Dennis Rehberg 2448 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515-2601 My family and I enjoy outdoor recreation on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service throughout Montana and Northern Idaho. I am writing to you to ask your help in addressing a serious concern regarding how the Forest Service is attempting to manage almost 4 million acres of Recommended Wilderness Areas (RWA). The Regional Forester in Montana, without the benefit of public review and comment, has decided that all motorized and mountain bike use in all 4 million acres of RWA's must be eliminated. Once an area has been designated as an RWA, no other option is provided for individual Forest Supervisors or District Rangers. It is a one size fits all policy that I believe is not only unwise, but also unlawful. I am writing to my political representatives as a last resort. I have previously written to the Forest Service asking for a review and revision of the RWA policy and it is clear that they are not listening. am asking you and your staff to look into this important matter. It is important for you to understand that there are many popular snowmobile areas and mountain bike trails within the existing 4 million acres of RWA's. This new policy will give no option except to eliminate these valid and (currently) legal uses of National Forest lands. It should be noted that this policy is not in any way consistent with any other U.S. Forest Service Region. I want to also emphasize that no opportunity was provided for public review or comment. Opportunity for public review and comment of major changes in policy is a basic mandate placed upon the U.S. Forest Service by Congress. There is nothing in law, regulations or even recent court decisions that require the U.S. Forest Service to prohibit motorized and mountain bike uses on lands recommended for Wilderness. To the contrary; recent court rulings suggest he agency should continue motorized uses in areas previously authorized for motorized use. Indeed, court rulings explicitly reject any claim that the agency is compelled to restrict motorized and mountain bike use. The courts have been clear on this point; only Congress can designate Wilderness. I respectfully request that you and your staff look into this matter immediately. Signature_______________________________________________ Name __________________________________________________ Address _________________________________________________ City _____________________________ State ___________________ Zip_____________ Please return this letter to: BlueRibbon Coalition, 4555 Burley Drive, Pocatello, ID 83202 for presentation to the Congressional Delegation
DeFacto Wilderness
Feb 2, 2009
HELP US STOP U.S. FOREST SERVICE REGION 1's DE-FACTO WILDERNESS POLICY IN MONTANA Jack Welch Special Project Consultant BlueRibbon Coalition The US Forest Service Region 1 (Northern Region) manages 25 million acres of public national forest and grasslands in Montana, North Dakota, northeast Washington, northern Idaho, and northwest South Dakota. Every time the U.S. Forest Service updates one of their Forest Plans they are required by law to review certain "roadless" lands and make a recommendation to the Secretary of Agriculture on which, if any, of their lands they think should be made Wilderness. These lands are known as "Recommended Wilderness Areas" or "RWAs." Under normal circumstances, the "Recommended" Wilderness classification is just that: a recommendation. The decision of "whether Wilderness" is supposed to be left to Congress and the American People. However, under guidance from the Regional Forester in Region 1, these lands must now be managed in a "Primitive" recreation classification where motorized vehicles, including snowmobiles and mountain bikes, are banned! There is nothing in law, regulation or recent court decisions that requires the U.S. Forest Service to prohibit motorized access in RWAs. To the contrary; recent court rulings suggest the agency should continue motorized uses in areas previously authorized for motorized use. Indeed, court rulings explicitly reject any claim the agency is compelled to restrict motorized access. Most of these RWAs currently have motorized use occurring in them. Some of these areas are popular snowmobile recreation areas. If the motorized uses didn't preclude the Forest Service from recommending them as Wilderness, then the Forest Service should not demand such motorized uses be stopped immediately! Pro-access groups, such as the BlueRibbon Coalition and the Montana Snowmobile Association, are committed to end to this abuse of power. Here is how you can help: 1) Join or renew your membership in Montana Snowmobile Association (MSA) and BlueRibbon Coalition (BRC)! BRC and MSA need financial resources to fight this closure scheme. The OHV community has no "war chest" to fight this and meeting with Montana's elected leaders, travel to Washington D.C., not to mention the inevitable lawsuits, is not cheap. 2) Send a letter to your elected representatives and ask that they oppose this unofficial "policy". Use the letter that can be down loaded at http://www.sharetrails.org/files/rwaletter.pdf Please send the signed letters to the BlueRibbon office for presentation to the Congressional delegation at a later date. 3) The BlueRibbon Coalition maintains an email "Action Alert" list that notifies people like you of key comment periods where your email or letter can make a difference and help us keep these areas open. I strongly encourage you to sign up on BRC's list so you will be notified of the latest developments. Visit the BlueRibbon website of www.sharetrails.org to sign up! Remember, millions of acres of prime recreational opportunities in Montana are threatened with closure. Your action could mean the difference between a "closed" sign and a "trail open" sign. Please take action today!_
Home | About | Calendar | Districts | Clubs | Join Us | Friends of MSA | News | Links | Admin